|
TASP 2003 at UT Austin:
The Mystery of Creativity |
|
reasonably remarkable
Sunday, July 03, 2005
edit (the next day): the following post is a response to adrian's "should i take chinese?" post that's not here anymore. continue discussing god, everyone.
[what went well: - almost nonexistent grammar that's really very similar to english - most of the words and even the characters are formed parataxically, so it just makes a lot of sense - you feel like you construct words more on gut feeling than grammatical rules; also, characters that look similar tend to sound similar as well. - sometimes convincing eunice that i understood anything she said - and generally, it's a really fun language, i don't know how else to describe it.
what's not so bad: - the intonations. again like a gut feeling thing - because it's somewhat musical in a sense, the sounds of words stick the way jingles on tv commercials do. plus it's what makes it all so fun. - again the parataxis thing; you can guess what a sentence means even if you don't know all the words in it.
what didn't go so well: - characters are so easy to forget - characters you don't know make it impossible for you to even read a paper after six years of study, much less anything literary - singing. how do you do the intonations at the same time?]
|
|