TASP 2003 at UT Austin: The Mystery of Creativity



reasonably remarkable



Sunday, July 03, 2005
edit (the next day): the following post is a response to adrian's "should i take chinese?" post that's not here anymore. continue discussing god, everyone.

[what went well:
- almost nonexistent grammar that's really very similar to english
- most of the words and even the characters are formed parataxically, so it just makes a lot of sense - you feel like you construct words more on gut feeling than grammatical rules; also, characters that look similar tend to sound similar as well.
- sometimes convincing eunice that i understood anything she said
- and generally, it's a really fun language, i don't know how else to describe it.

what's not so bad:
- the intonations. again like a gut feeling thing - because it's somewhat musical in a sense, the sounds of words stick the way jingles on tv commercials do. plus it's what makes it all so fun.
- again the parataxis thing; you can guess what a sentence means even if you don't know all the words in it.

what didn't go so well:
- characters are so easy to forget
- characters you don't know make it impossible for you to even read a paper after six years of study, much less anything literary
- singing. how do you do the intonations at the same time?]

XML This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
 
 
[ recommended for discussion ]
Existentialism is A Humanism, Essay by Sarte
preface to the lyrical ballads
the trial
heidegger's what calls for thinking
When Life Almost Died (deals with the Permian mass Extinction)
elizabeth costello
the god of small things
jung's aion
foucault's pendulum
coetzee's nobel acceptance speech
faulkner's nobel acceptance speech
koestler's The Act of Creation: part one, the jester
my mother and the roomer
Tao, the Greeks, and other important things
rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead

endgame
the book of job
Trilobites
joseph campbell